Quads On The Board Poker
Poker Quads On Board Yahoo
Poker Quads On Board Racing
Poker Quads On Board Images

Jan 17, 2019 Quick Quads is a video poker game that I first noticed at the Red Rock in September, 2008. For the first five coins bet per hand, the game plays like ordinary multi-play video poker. For an optional sixth coin bet, the player qualifies to add two cards together to complete a four of a kind. Re: Poker & Quads on the board True story - this was in a free poker game in a bar, so nothing important at state - but the board showed 4 queens and an Ace. Three players were still in the hand. Nov 26, 2018 What is Quads in Poker? Quads is a common nickname for four-of-a-kind in poker. In fact, the nickname quads is so common, that it has virtually replaced four-of-a-kind as the official name for this type of holding. It’s simply a lot easier to say that four-of-a-kind.

Posted by kid dynamite
on July 5th, 2012

In case you haven’t heard, there was a $ 1MM buy in tournament at the World Series of Poker this year. This hand came up on day one, in the fourth blind level. The participants were businessman John Morgan and Russian businessman and frequent poker player Mikhail Smirnov. From poker forum 2+2:

“Phil Galfond just witnessed the unthinkable.

“I’ve never seen a fold like that, absolutely not,” the cash game pro said.

At around 5 p.m. local time during the fourth blind level, Galfond was present to see his table mate in the $1 million buy-in WSOP event, Russian semi-pro Mikhail Smirnov, fold quads on the river to an all-in bet.

According to Smirnov, the action started with Tom Dwan opening to 32,000. Smirnov called from the small blind with the 88, and businessman John Morgan called from the big blind.

The flop fell J87. Smirnov bet 50,000, Morgan called quickly, and Dwan folded.

The 8 hit the turn. Smirnov bet 200,000. Morgan called instantly.

Smirnov said Morgan looked very excited on the turn.

The K landed on the river, and Smirnov bet 700,000, which was more than the pot of 600,000. Morgan thought about it briefly and then shoved for about 3.4 million total, which was about the size of Smirnov’s stack. Smirnov folded the quads face up.

“For me, it was a very easy fold,” Smirnov said. Harrahs casino lake tahoe nevada. “If he had two kings before the flop he would have re-raised Dwan, because he’s been active and raising a lot. So, two kings was impossible. Two jacks, in theory, was possible.”

Smirnov said that he thought jacks full of eights wouldn’t have been such a confident shove on the river. “He was like all-in, no problem. Before he had been playing very carefully and tight.”

According to his logic, Morgan would have the 109.

The size of the buy-in was not a factor in the decision, Smirnov said. He added that Morgan seemed visibly upset after the hand, giving more validity to the fold.

“I personally couldn’t have done it,” Galfond said. “I’d lose sleep. But, I think it was a reasonable fold actually. There are definitely very few hands John could have had that weren’t a straight flush. Jacks full was probably the one that made the most sense, other than a straight flush.”

According to Galfond, the table erupted once the quads were shown. Agua caliente casino buffet menu. Dwan left the table in disbelief.”

Now, a few more tidbits for you:

1) Morgan’s reaction, from WSOP.com:

“When pressed for an answer as to whether he actually had the stone-cold lock, a straight flush, Morgan smiled at first. Then, he paused. Then, he spoke.

“I’m not going to tell anyone,” Morgan said softly. “And the reason I am not going to reveal it is totally out of respect for my opponent.””

2) Smirnov’s reaction, from WSOP.com:

“Later, Smirnov was asked about the remarkable hand and his decision to fold a monster (Writer’s Note: English is not Mr. Smirnov’s first language – his comments to Nolan Dalla are printed verbatim):

“It’s hard for me to explain. It seemed like a very difficult call to make. But for me — I think that my read of the table and when you think about this hand and it’s very easy for me to fold. It was the right play. Sometimes it’s very difficult to fold top pair, but this time I don’t know what he should have. It’s impossible for him to have full house of Kings, impossible full house of Jacks, because he did not re-raise from button (pre-flop). He would have re-raised with Jacks and Kings (pre-flop). If he has full house of sevens, then he’d just call (the river bet). A bluff is impossible because he likes to play in the tournament and he is not a professional. I think I have no chance to win, plus he was so excited on the turn (when he made, what could be a straight flush).”

3) Smirnov’s description of the hand, from ESPN.com:

“Tom Dwan from the button raised 32,000, his regular raise. I’m small blind. Call. The gentlemen [Minnesota businessman John Morgan] in big blind called. After this, 7s-Js-8c on the flop. I [bet] from first position, 50,000. [There was an] instant call from the gentleman, and Tom Dwan folded. Then, the eight of spades [on the turn]. Now it’s 7-8-J of spades and 8 of clubs. I bet approximately 200,000, approximately the pot. This gentleman instantly called and was very excited. [He looked] around like all cameras in the world are looking at our hand. I don’t know why, but it is looking for me like this. After this, the king of spades on the river. I bet 700,000, a little more than pot. I over-bet. Five seconds thinking and he is all-in for 700,000 and 2 million. For me, it’s an easy fold. But I maybe thought for two minutes. For me, in real game for example, [it’s an] easy fold.

“I had physical tells plus technically, if he has two kings, he’d raise before the flop because he is a very straightforward player and Tom Dwan raised from button. Only one hand possible in theory, two jacks, but if he has two jacks, I think first of all, he’d raise Tom before the flop, though that is not 100 percent, plus, he would think more on the river because with kings plus straight flush plus two eights, he has [with jacks] only the fourth-best combination. … He should be thinking more about the pot. He was so excited on turn, the king did not frighten him at all. My over-bet did not frighten him, plus before this, he played very straightforward … very tight. He likes to participate in tournament. He cares not about money. … All together, I think [it’s an] easy fold.

“He was very upset after the hand. I think he had a straight flush, but because he didn’t show the hand, someone else [asked] what he had and he wasn’t happy. Maybe now I’m free-rolling in this tournament.”

4) Description of Morgan’s eventual bust out hand, from 2+2 – doesn’t exactly seem like the kind of guy who only shoves with the nuts.

5) ESPN’s Gary Wise talked to Morgan later:

“Wise: Did you have the straight flush?
Morgan: I had a royal flush!
W: There was no royal flush on the board.
M: I had 7-2 of diamonds.
W: 7-2 of diamonds, huh?

Morgan smiled.

W: What did you have?
M: He made a good fold.”

Now, you can read the massive 2+2 thread, with all of the poker hand range analysis you want, and you can spend all day analyzing the possible hand holdings, frequencies, etc etc etc. If you don’t know the players, as almost none of us do, it’s a moot point to some extent: we’re just guesstimating. But there’s one thing that I didn’t see mentioned at all in that entire thread: Smirnov was relying on his read of Morgan – but there’s a problem when you’re trying to get a read on an amateur. First of all, I’m not saying that Morgan is a fool, or a novice – I have no idea – but he is not a poker professional, and everything I’ve read about him points to him being a businessman who enjoys poker. One problem with non-professionals (can we just call them amateurs?) is that they sometimes misread the strength OF THEIR OWN HAND. Thus, as their opponent, you get a false read: you read supreme strength because your opponent is thinking on a different level from you and thinks his hand is stronger than it is!

I remember a very vivid application of this theory: it was a hand that Doyle Brunson played aga

Poker Quads On Board